The elections that was and loving democracy

I am writing this column about 5 days from the May 14 elections. By the time this column goes to print (Wednesday, May 16) the elections are over.
           
We would know who won or who most probably will win (if the canvassing of votes is still in progress) by the time you read this column.
           
Thus, at the time I am writing this column I would actually be predicting some outcomes.
           
I’d rather not mention names, but principles and practices.
           
Winners are determined by a lot of factors. My observation of recent elections is that the winners reflect the combined sentiments of the voters. It is not all or even mainly about money given by candidates to vulnerable voters.
           
The winners always reflect what voters want from their Governors, Mayors and legislative officials.
           
The composition of the winners clearly shows what kind of officials and government people want. I feel this is the beauty of democracy. (Assuming that the votes are properly counted).
           
The winners usually come from different professions and political colors. No profession can lay claim to elective office partly I suppose because these days voters value character more than the educational attainment and profession of a candidate.
           
As our democracy matures, so have the voters. For instance, being a movie actor is no longer a passport to victory. Popularity can be achieved in many ways.
           
Overall, I can see an enthusiastic turn-out of voters as they relish the exercise of their freedom to vote. The election is about the only way where all are equal since a voter, rich or poor, is entitled to only one vote.