Security and development

The Human Security Act has created many adverse comments among those who believe that its provisions will be used to suppress freedom, particularly to peaceably assemble and to speak freely.
           
Those who support this law point to the national interest as the main justification for putting limits to the exercise of such freedoms.
           
We are conscious of our freedoms. We are proud of our democracy.
           
The three branches of government (legislative, executive and judicial) are mandated to follow our Constitution that highlights the Bill of Rights which essentially protects individual rights from the possible abuse of power by the state.
           
When implemented properly and as the law is made a guide to action, those fears are expected to subside.
           
The relationship of peace and development does not need much discussion. In our situation in Eastern Visayas where tourism is a major strategy, any act of terrorism will certainly derail all plans to attract more tourists.
           
The Bali (Indonesia) bombing a few years back is an example of how terrorists can take advantage of the presence of tourists to ensure that their message is heard, literally, in a violent way.
           
It can also be said that we must bear in mind that an antidote to terrorism is a healthy economy where poverty is at its barest minimum.
           
This law and its implementation have to be part of a comprehensive set of activities focused on improving living conditions throughout the country.

With an improved economy, we can live in more peaceful communities.